Questão de InglêsInterpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
- Banca:
- CESPE / CEBRASPE
- Órgão:
- Instituto Rio Branco
- Ano:
- 2025
- Modalidade:
- Certo ou Errado
- Código:
- Q3517844
Texto associado
Diplomacy is often described as an art, involving
decisions shaped by sensitive political nuances that require
human judgment, cultural understanding, and emotional
intelligence — qualities that AI cannot fully replicate. While AI
can support decision-making, it may also manipulate human
behavior subtly, especially through systems developed in
countries with different geopolitical priorities. This deepens the
AI divide between technologically advanced and resource-limited
nations, embedding linguistic and cultural biases and reinforcing
global power asymmetries. As algorithms take their place
alongside diplomats, the art of negotiation now meets the science
of AI. The future of diplomacy must lie in fostering a symbiotic
relationship where AI enhances human expertise, streamlines
processes, and offers new strategic tools while leaving the
nuanced art of diplomacy in human hands.
decisions shaped by sensitive political nuances that require
human judgment, cultural understanding, and emotional
intelligence — qualities that AI cannot fully replicate. While AI
can support decision-making, it may also manipulate human
behavior subtly, especially through systems developed in
countries with different geopolitical priorities. This deepens the
AI divide between technologically advanced and resource-limited
nations, embedding linguistic and cultural biases and reinforcing
global power asymmetries. As algorithms take their place
alongside diplomats, the art of negotiation now meets the science
of AI. The future of diplomacy must lie in fostering a symbiotic
relationship where AI enhances human expertise, streamlines
processes, and offers new strategic tools while leaving the
nuanced art of diplomacy in human hands.
Diplomatic institutions adopting such technologies should
also adopt guardrails to clarify how these systems inform
decision-making. To ensure that AI systems function
appropriately across diverse cultural contexts, adaptive and
responsible AI frameworks should be integrated into policy
discussions at the national and international levels. Crucially, any
AI deployment must prioritise human agency. The goal must not
be to automate diplomacy, but to augment it. AI’s incorporation
into diplomacy offers both promise and peril. While the
technology supports efficiency and expands access to
information, it must be governed by strong ethical frameworks,
particularly when it can shape global power relations through
sensitive negotiations. Rather than embracing AI as a magic
wand, it must be approached as a double-edged sword that is
capable of assisting, but never replacing the unique human skills
that diplomacy demands.
also adopt guardrails to clarify how these systems inform
decision-making. To ensure that AI systems function
appropriately across diverse cultural contexts, adaptive and
responsible AI frameworks should be integrated into policy
discussions at the national and international levels. Crucially, any
AI deployment must prioritise human agency. The goal must not
be to automate diplomacy, but to augment it. AI’s incorporation
into diplomacy offers both promise and peril. While the
technology supports efficiency and expands access to
information, it must be governed by strong ethical frameworks,
particularly when it can shape global power relations through
sensitive negotiations. Rather than embracing AI as a magic
wand, it must be approached as a double-edged sword that is
capable of assisting, but never replacing the unique human skills
that diplomacy demands.
Anusha Guru. The Future of Diplomacy: AI’s Expanding Role in International Affairs.
In: Observer Research Foundation, 18/6/2025. Internet:<www.orfonline.org> (adapted).
Judge the following item based on the ideas presented in the
preceding text, as well as on its linguistic aspects.
The author argues that the ethical governance of AI’s
application in diplomacy is especially critical because its
influence may extend beyond technical efficiency to altering
the global distribution of political power.